Multinomial, Poisson and Gaussian statistics in count data analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

It is generally known that counting statistics is not correctly described by a Gaussian approximation. Nevertheless, in neutron scattering, it is common practice to apply this approximation to the counting statistics; also at low counting numbers. We show that the application of this approximation leads to skewed results not only for low-count features, such as background level estimation, but also for its estimation at double-digit count numbers. In effect, this approximation is shown to be imprecise on all levels of count. Instead, a Multinomial approach is introduced as well as a more standard Poisson method, which we compare with the Gaussian case. These two methods originate from a proper analysis of a multi-detector setup and a standard triple axis instrument.

We devise a simple mathematical procedure to produce unbiased fits using the Multinomial distribution and demonstrate this method on synthetic and actual inelastic scattering data. We find that the Multinomial method provide almost unbiased results, and in some cases outperforms the Poisson statistics. Although significantly biased, the Gaussian approach is in general more robust in cases where the fitted model is not a true representation of reality. For this reason, a proper data analysis toolbox for low-count neutron scattering should therefore contain more than one model for counting statistics.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Neutron Research
Volume23
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)69-92
Number of pages24
ISSN1023-8166
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

    Research areas

  • Poisson statistics, Multinomial statistics, data analysis, neutron scattering, NEUTRON-SCATTERING, CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS

Links

ID: 269910456