Grappling with the Future: The Messiness of Pilot Implementation in Information Systems Design
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Grappling with the Future: The Messiness of Pilot Implementation in Information Systems Design. / Hertzum, Morten; Manikas, Maria Ie; Torkilsheyggi, Arnvør Martinsdóttir á.
In: Health Informatics Journal, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2019, p. 372-388.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Grappling with the Future: The Messiness of Pilot Implementation in Information Systems Design
AU - Hertzum, Morten
AU - Manikas, Maria Ie
AU - Torkilsheyggi, Arnvør Martinsdóttir á
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Pilot implementation is a method for avoiding unintended consequences of healthcare information systems. This study investigates how learning from pilot implementations is situated, messy, and therefore difficult. We analyze two pilot implementations by means of observation and interviews. In the first pilot implementation the involved porters saw their improved overview of pending patient transports as an opportunity for more self-organization but this opportunity hinged on the unclear prospects of extending the system with functionality for the porters to reply to transport requests. In the second pilot implementation the involved paramedics had to print the data they entered into the system because it had not yet been integrated with the electronic patient record. This extra work prolonged every dispatch and influenced the paramedics’ experience of the entire system. We discuss how pilot implementations, in spite of their realism, leave room for uncertainty about the implications of the new system.
AB - Pilot implementation is a method for avoiding unintended consequences of healthcare information systems. This study investigates how learning from pilot implementations is situated, messy, and therefore difficult. We analyze two pilot implementations by means of observation and interviews. In the first pilot implementation the involved porters saw their improved overview of pending patient transports as an opportunity for more self-organization but this opportunity hinged on the unclear prospects of extending the system with functionality for the porters to reply to transport requests. In the second pilot implementation the involved paramedics had to print the data they entered into the system because it had not yet been integrated with the electronic patient record. This extra work prolonged every dispatch and influenced the paramedics’ experience of the entire system. We discuss how pilot implementations, in spite of their realism, leave room for uncertainty about the implications of the new system.
KW - Faculty of Humanities
KW - Emergency Medical Services
KW - patient transport
KW - Pilot implementation
KW - sociotechnical systems
U2 - 10.1177/1460458217712058
DO - 10.1177/1460458217712058
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 28592181
VL - 25
SP - 372
EP - 388
JO - Health Informatics Journal
JF - Health Informatics Journal
SN - 1460-4582
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 184649396