Weapon of the Weak? The Social Media Landscape of Interest Groups
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Weapon of the Weak? The Social Media Landscape of Interest Groups. / Amber, Van der Graaf; Otjes, Simon; Rasmussen, Anne.
In: European Journal of Communication, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2, 2016, p. 120-135.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Weapon of the Weak?
T2 - The Social Media Landscape of Interest Groups
AU - Amber, Van der Graaf
AU - Otjes, Simon
AU - Rasmussen, Anne
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Social media have the potential to offset existing inequalities in representation among interest groups and act as a ‘weapon of the weak’ by providing a technological infrastructure that allows even groups with limited resources to create content and interact across the globe. We expand on the sparse existing literature on interest groups and social media in a quantitative, structuralanalysis of both the range and volume of social media use examining a data set of groups active in European Union lobbying. Despite the positive expectations, we find limited evidence that social media have been able to reinvigorate democratic processes by changing inequalities in the landscape of political representation among interest groups. The level of resources held bythe interest groups acts as the single most consistent predictor of both the range and volume of their social media use. Interest groups representing citizen and worker interests do play a leading role in explaining the volume of social media use, but the landscape is dominated by large interest groups with an international scope rather than by small, national ones. Moreover, firmsalso use a broad range of different social media platforms even if they lose ground to traditional membership groups when the actual volume of Twitter and Facebook use is assessed.
AB - Social media have the potential to offset existing inequalities in representation among interest groups and act as a ‘weapon of the weak’ by providing a technological infrastructure that allows even groups with limited resources to create content and interact across the globe. We expand on the sparse existing literature on interest groups and social media in a quantitative, structuralanalysis of both the range and volume of social media use examining a data set of groups active in European Union lobbying. Despite the positive expectations, we find limited evidence that social media have been able to reinvigorate democratic processes by changing inequalities in the landscape of political representation among interest groups. The level of resources held bythe interest groups acts as the single most consistent predictor of both the range and volume of their social media use. Interest groups representing citizen and worker interests do play a leading role in explaining the volume of social media use, but the landscape is dominated by large interest groups with an international scope rather than by small, national ones. Moreover, firmsalso use a broad range of different social media platforms even if they lose ground to traditional membership groups when the actual volume of Twitter and Facebook use is assessed.
KW - Faculty of Social Sciences
KW - social media
KW - international communication
KW - Internet
KW - political communication
KW - Public Sphere
U2 - 10.1177/0267323115612210
DO - 10.1177/0267323115612210
M3 - Journal article
VL - 31
SP - 120
EP - 135
JO - European Journal of Communication
JF - European Journal of Communication
SN - 0267-3231
IS - 2
M1 - 2
ER -
ID: 137755343