Brief communication: Estimating the ice thickness of the Müller Ice Cap to support selection of a drill site

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Brief communication : Estimating the ice thickness of the Müller Ice Cap to support selection of a drill site. / Zinck, Ann Sofie Priergaard; Grinsted, Aslak.

In: Cryosphere, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2022, p. 1399-1407.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Zinck, ASP & Grinsted, A 2022, 'Brief communication: Estimating the ice thickness of the Müller Ice Cap to support selection of a drill site', Cryosphere, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1399-1407. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1399-2022

APA

Zinck, A. S. P., & Grinsted, A. (2022). Brief communication: Estimating the ice thickness of the Müller Ice Cap to support selection of a drill site. Cryosphere, 16(4), 1399-1407. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1399-2022

Vancouver

Zinck ASP, Grinsted A. Brief communication: Estimating the ice thickness of the Müller Ice Cap to support selection of a drill site. Cryosphere. 2022;16(4):1399-1407. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1399-2022

Author

Zinck, Ann Sofie Priergaard ; Grinsted, Aslak. / Brief communication : Estimating the ice thickness of the Müller Ice Cap to support selection of a drill site. In: Cryosphere. 2022 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 1399-1407.

Bibtex

@article{68e11290b4fe4c9b8875aaf4001d6573,
title = "Brief communication: Estimating the ice thickness of the M{\"u}ller Ice Cap to support selection of a drill site",
abstract = "The M{\"u}ller Ice Cap will soon set the scene for a new drilling project. Therefore, ice thickness estimates are necessary for planning, since thickness measurements of the ice cap are sparse. Here, three models are presented and compared: (i) a simple Semi-Empirical Ice Thickness Model (SEITMo) based on an inversion of the shallow-ice approximation by the use of a single radar line in combination with the glacier outline, surface slope, and elevation; (ii) an iterative inverse method using the Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM), and (iii) a velocity-based inversion of the shallow-ice approximation. The velocity-based inversion underestimates the ice thickness at the ice cap top, making the model less useful to aid in drill site selection, whereas PISM and the SEITMo mostly agree about a good drill site candidate. However, the new SEITMo is insensitive to mass balance, computationally fast, and provides as good fits as PISM.",
author = "Zinck, {Ann Sofie Priergaard} and Aslak Grinsted",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Ann-Sofie Priergaard Zinck.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.5194/tc-16-1399-2022",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1399--1407",
journal = "The Cryosphere",
issn = "1994-0416",
publisher = "Copernicus GmbH",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brief communication

T2 - Estimating the ice thickness of the Müller Ice Cap to support selection of a drill site

AU - Zinck, Ann Sofie Priergaard

AU - Grinsted, Aslak

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Ann-Sofie Priergaard Zinck.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The Müller Ice Cap will soon set the scene for a new drilling project. Therefore, ice thickness estimates are necessary for planning, since thickness measurements of the ice cap are sparse. Here, three models are presented and compared: (i) a simple Semi-Empirical Ice Thickness Model (SEITMo) based on an inversion of the shallow-ice approximation by the use of a single radar line in combination with the glacier outline, surface slope, and elevation; (ii) an iterative inverse method using the Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM), and (iii) a velocity-based inversion of the shallow-ice approximation. The velocity-based inversion underestimates the ice thickness at the ice cap top, making the model less useful to aid in drill site selection, whereas PISM and the SEITMo mostly agree about a good drill site candidate. However, the new SEITMo is insensitive to mass balance, computationally fast, and provides as good fits as PISM.

AB - The Müller Ice Cap will soon set the scene for a new drilling project. Therefore, ice thickness estimates are necessary for planning, since thickness measurements of the ice cap are sparse. Here, three models are presented and compared: (i) a simple Semi-Empirical Ice Thickness Model (SEITMo) based on an inversion of the shallow-ice approximation by the use of a single radar line in combination with the glacier outline, surface slope, and elevation; (ii) an iterative inverse method using the Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM), and (iii) a velocity-based inversion of the shallow-ice approximation. The velocity-based inversion underestimates the ice thickness at the ice cap top, making the model less useful to aid in drill site selection, whereas PISM and the SEITMo mostly agree about a good drill site candidate. However, the new SEITMo is insensitive to mass balance, computationally fast, and provides as good fits as PISM.

U2 - 10.5194/tc-16-1399-2022

DO - 10.5194/tc-16-1399-2022

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85129294806

VL - 16

SP - 1399

EP - 1407

JO - The Cryosphere

JF - The Cryosphere

SN - 1994-0416

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 342925373