The Copenhagen Interpretation
In the middle of the 1920s Niels Bohr and his team really went to work to formulate the principles of quantum mechanics. His original atomic model from 1913 described the movement of electrons as point particles that moved along fixed orbits, but this classic approach was in conflict the general properties of the atoms, particularly their behaviour in crystals and chemical compounds.
In 1925, Werner Heisenberg formulated an entirely new theory with his development of matrix mechanics. The following year, Erwin Schrödinger developed wave mechanics based on Louis de Broglie’s hypothesis of the wave properties of particles. Werner Heisenberg’s described particle as particles, while Erwin Schrödinger’s theory described particles as waves and many physicists travelled to Copenhagen to consult with each other over this puzzling contradiction. Discussions were held in large and small meetings, sometimes with two or three participants or at dinner with the Bohr family.
Towards the end of 1927, the differences of opinion converged to a consensus based on Niels Bohr’s principle of complementarity, which holds that a physical phenomenon is observed in two different ‘complementary’ ways depending on the experimental setup. For example, light could sometimes behave like waves and other times like particles. Both images were necessary to obtain a complete description of the phenomenon, even though they excluded each other.
Niels Bohr argued this radical point of view for the first time at a conference in Italy in late summer 1927 and repeated it at the Solvay Conference a few weeks later. This, which was later called the Copenhagen Interpretation, formed the foundation for the famous debates between Niels Bohr and Albert Einstein at the Solvay Conferences in 1927 and 1930.
Albert Einstein could not accept a theory of physics, which gave up classical causality. While Niels Bohr believed that quantum mechanics provided a new and valuable understanding of the world, Albert Einstein considered the theory as temporary and worked hard for the rest of his life to formulate a new and better theory, which incorporated classical causality.
Niels Bohr’s debates with Albert Einstein at the Solvay Conferences include some of the most intense and deep exchanges of views on physics and its philosophy in the twentieth century. Again and again Albert Einstein presented thought experiments that disproved the Copenhagen Interpretation. Each time Niels Bohr slept on the problem and by the following day he could ingeniously contradict Albert Einstein’s objections. On one occasion he even used Albert Einstein’s own general theory of relativity for the purpose.
|
|
|