Temperature dependent climate projection deficiencies in CMIP5 models

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Temperature dependent climate projection deficiencies in CMIP5 models. / Christensen, Jens H.; Boberg, Fredrik.

I: Geophysical Research Letters, Bind 39, Nr. 24, L24705, 28.12.2012.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Christensen, JH & Boberg, F 2012, 'Temperature dependent climate projection deficiencies in CMIP5 models', Geophysical Research Letters, bind 39, nr. 24, L24705. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053650

APA

Christensen, J. H., & Boberg, F. (2012). Temperature dependent climate projection deficiencies in CMIP5 models. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(24), [L24705]. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053650

Vancouver

Christensen JH, Boberg F. Temperature dependent climate projection deficiencies in CMIP5 models. Geophysical Research Letters. 2012 dec. 28;39(24). L24705. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053650

Author

Christensen, Jens H. ; Boberg, Fredrik. / Temperature dependent climate projection deficiencies in CMIP5 models. I: Geophysical Research Letters. 2012 ; Bind 39, Nr. 24.

Bibtex

@article{0dc1ab61ed3d4f44ba280e1100041142,
title = "Temperature dependent climate projection deficiencies in CMIP5 models",
abstract = "Monthly mean temperatures for 34 GCMs available from the CMIP5 project are compared with observations from CRU for 26 different land regions covering all major land areas in the world for the period 1961-2000 by means of quantile-quantile (q-q) diagrams. A warm period positive temperature dependent bias is identified for many of the models within many of the chosen climate regions. However, the exact temperature dependence varies considerably between the models. We analyse the role of this difference as a contributing factor for some models to project stronger regional warming than others by looking at the entire ensemble rather than individual models. RCP4.5 temperature projections from all GCMs for two time periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2100) are compared against a linear fit to the 50% warmest months from the respective q-q plot for each model and region. Taken together, we find that in general models with a positive temperature dependent bias tend to have a large projected temperature change, and these tendencies increase with increasing global warming level. We argue that this appears to be linked with the ability of models to capture complex feedbacks accurately. In particular land-surface atmosphere interactions are treated differently and with different degree of realism between models.",
author = "Christensen, {Jens H.} and Fredrik Boberg",
year = "2012",
month = dec,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1029/2012GL053650",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
journal = "Geophysical Research Letters",
issn = "0094-8276",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "24",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temperature dependent climate projection deficiencies in CMIP5 models

AU - Christensen, Jens H.

AU - Boberg, Fredrik

PY - 2012/12/28

Y1 - 2012/12/28

N2 - Monthly mean temperatures for 34 GCMs available from the CMIP5 project are compared with observations from CRU for 26 different land regions covering all major land areas in the world for the period 1961-2000 by means of quantile-quantile (q-q) diagrams. A warm period positive temperature dependent bias is identified for many of the models within many of the chosen climate regions. However, the exact temperature dependence varies considerably between the models. We analyse the role of this difference as a contributing factor for some models to project stronger regional warming than others by looking at the entire ensemble rather than individual models. RCP4.5 temperature projections from all GCMs for two time periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2100) are compared against a linear fit to the 50% warmest months from the respective q-q plot for each model and region. Taken together, we find that in general models with a positive temperature dependent bias tend to have a large projected temperature change, and these tendencies increase with increasing global warming level. We argue that this appears to be linked with the ability of models to capture complex feedbacks accurately. In particular land-surface atmosphere interactions are treated differently and with different degree of realism between models.

AB - Monthly mean temperatures for 34 GCMs available from the CMIP5 project are compared with observations from CRU for 26 different land regions covering all major land areas in the world for the period 1961-2000 by means of quantile-quantile (q-q) diagrams. A warm period positive temperature dependent bias is identified for many of the models within many of the chosen climate regions. However, the exact temperature dependence varies considerably between the models. We analyse the role of this difference as a contributing factor for some models to project stronger regional warming than others by looking at the entire ensemble rather than individual models. RCP4.5 temperature projections from all GCMs for two time periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2100) are compared against a linear fit to the 50% warmest months from the respective q-q plot for each model and region. Taken together, we find that in general models with a positive temperature dependent bias tend to have a large projected temperature change, and these tendencies increase with increasing global warming level. We argue that this appears to be linked with the ability of models to capture complex feedbacks accurately. In particular land-surface atmosphere interactions are treated differently and with different degree of realism between models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871749370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2012GL053650

DO - 10.1029/2012GL053650

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84871749370

VL - 39

JO - Geophysical Research Letters

JF - Geophysical Research Letters

SN - 0094-8276

IS - 24

M1 - L24705

ER -

ID: 186940223