The Concept of Time in 2D Quantum Gravity

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

The Concept of Time in 2D Quantum Gravity. / Ambjørn, Jan; Anagnostopoulos, K.N.; Jurkiewicz, Jerzy; Kristjansen, Charlotte Fløe.

I: Journal of High Energy Physics, Bind 1998, Nr. 4, 016, 01.04.1998.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ambjørn, J, Anagnostopoulos, KN, Jurkiewicz, J & Kristjansen, CF 1998, 'The Concept of Time in 2D Quantum Gravity', Journal of High Energy Physics, bind 1998, nr. 4, 016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/1998/04/016

APA

Ambjørn, J., Anagnostopoulos, K. N., Jurkiewicz, J., & Kristjansen, C. F. (1998). The Concept of Time in 2D Quantum Gravity. Journal of High Energy Physics, 1998(4), [016]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/1998/04/016

Vancouver

Ambjørn J, Anagnostopoulos KN, Jurkiewicz J, Kristjansen CF. The Concept of Time in 2D Quantum Gravity. Journal of High Energy Physics. 1998 apr. 1;1998(4). 016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/1998/04/016

Author

Ambjørn, Jan ; Anagnostopoulos, K.N. ; Jurkiewicz, Jerzy ; Kristjansen, Charlotte Fløe. / The Concept of Time in 2D Quantum Gravity. I: Journal of High Energy Physics. 1998 ; Bind 1998, Nr. 4.

Bibtex

@article{a6e537d074c911dbbee902004c4f4f50,
title = "The Concept of Time in 2D Quantum Gravity",
abstract = "We show that the {"}time{"} ts defined via spin clusters in the Ising model coupled to 2d gravity leads to a fractal dimension dh(s) = 6 of space-time at the critical point, as advocated by Ishibashi and Kawai. In the unmagnetized phase, however, this definition of Hausdorff dimension breaks down. Numerical measurements are consistent with these results. The same definition leads to dh(s) = 16 at the critical point when applied to flat space. The fractal dimension dh(s) is in disagreement with both analytical prediction and numerical determination of the fractal dimension dh(g), which is based on the use of the geodesic distance tg as {"}proper time{"}. There seems to be no simple relation of the kind ts = t9dh(g)/dh(s) as expected by dimensional reasons.",
author = "Jan Ambj{\o}rn and K.N. Anagnostopoulos and Jerzy Jurkiewicz and Kristjansen, {Charlotte Fl{\o}e}",
note = "NBI98",
year = "1998",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1088/1126-6708/1998/04/016",
language = "English",
volume = "1998",
journal = "Journal of High Energy Physics (Online)",
issn = "1126-6708",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Concept of Time in 2D Quantum Gravity

AU - Ambjørn, Jan

AU - Anagnostopoulos, K.N.

AU - Jurkiewicz, Jerzy

AU - Kristjansen, Charlotte Fløe

N1 - NBI98

PY - 1998/4/1

Y1 - 1998/4/1

N2 - We show that the "time" ts defined via spin clusters in the Ising model coupled to 2d gravity leads to a fractal dimension dh(s) = 6 of space-time at the critical point, as advocated by Ishibashi and Kawai. In the unmagnetized phase, however, this definition of Hausdorff dimension breaks down. Numerical measurements are consistent with these results. The same definition leads to dh(s) = 16 at the critical point when applied to flat space. The fractal dimension dh(s) is in disagreement with both analytical prediction and numerical determination of the fractal dimension dh(g), which is based on the use of the geodesic distance tg as "proper time". There seems to be no simple relation of the kind ts = t9dh(g)/dh(s) as expected by dimensional reasons.

AB - We show that the "time" ts defined via spin clusters in the Ising model coupled to 2d gravity leads to a fractal dimension dh(s) = 6 of space-time at the critical point, as advocated by Ishibashi and Kawai. In the unmagnetized phase, however, this definition of Hausdorff dimension breaks down. Numerical measurements are consistent with these results. The same definition leads to dh(s) = 16 at the critical point when applied to flat space. The fractal dimension dh(s) is in disagreement with both analytical prediction and numerical determination of the fractal dimension dh(g), which is based on the use of the geodesic distance tg as "proper time". There seems to be no simple relation of the kind ts = t9dh(g)/dh(s) as expected by dimensional reasons.

U2 - 10.1088/1126-6708/1998/04/016

DO - 10.1088/1126-6708/1998/04/016

M3 - Journal article

VL - 1998

JO - Journal of High Energy Physics (Online)

JF - Journal of High Energy Physics (Online)

SN - 1126-6708

IS - 4

M1 - 016

ER -

ID: 202231