Getting Real or Staying Positive? Legal Realism(s), Legal Positivism, and the Prospects of Naturalism in Jurisprudence
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Dokumenter
- Getting real or staying positive
Indsendt manuskript, 802 KB, PDF-dokument
The relationship between Legal Realism and Legal Positivism has been a recurrent source of debate. The question has been further complicated by the related difficulty of assessing the internal relationship between the two main original strands of Legal Realism: American and Scandinavian. This paper suggests considering American and Scandinavian Realism as instantiations of forward-looking and backward-looking rule skepticism respectively. This distinction brings into sharp relief not only the fundamentally different relationship between each of these two Realist schools and Legal Positivism but also their equally different potentials as starting points for naturalizing jurisprudence.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Ratio Juris |
Vol/bind | 29 |
Udgave nummer | 4 |
Sider (fra-til) | 535-555 |
Antal sider | 21 |
ISSN | 0952-1917 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 1 dec. 2016 |
Begivenhed | New Frontiers of Legal Realism: American, Scandinavian, European, Global - Copenhagen Varighed: 29 maj 2012 → 30 maj 2012 |
Konference
Konference | New Frontiers of Legal Realism: American, Scandinavian, European, Global |
---|---|
By | Copenhagen |
Periode | 29/05/2012 → 30/05/2012 |
- Det Juridiske Fakultet
Forskningsområder
Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk
Ingen data tilgængelig
ID: 40358535