Kunstbegrebets Koloniale Klassifikationer til Forhandling på Museer i Sydafrika
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Kunstbegrebets Koloniale Klassifikationer til Forhandling på Museer i Sydafrika. / Nielsen, Vibe.
I: Kulturstudier, Bind 1, 2021, s. 89-112.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Kunstbegrebets Koloniale Klassifikationer til Forhandling på Museer i Sydafrika
AU - Nielsen, Vibe
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - This article examines the consequences of expanding classificatory boundaries. Since the end of apartheid in 1994, objects formerly known as ethnographica are now largely found in art galleries and treated like objects of aesthetic rather than cultural historical value. I highlight how a number of contemporary South African curators reject this assumed valorisation that the objects supposedly gain when they are exhibited in the realm of the aesthetics. However, in arguing that contemporary South African artists are just as contemporary, experimental, conceptual and non-traditional as their counterparts from the Global North, the curators let go of an important part of the artistic history of Africa. If so-called traditional African objects are not to be displayed in art galleries, where then, is there room for art forms that are rooted in traditions from Africa before European contact? This article argues that colonial distinctions between art and artefact might be challenged, if curators and museum professionals start highlighting that all objects, no matter who made them, possess both aesthetic and cultural historical value. In this way museums might be able to look beyond colonial classificatory practices and let go of the hierarchy between objects that the material culture of Africa has endured during the past century.
AB - This article examines the consequences of expanding classificatory boundaries. Since the end of apartheid in 1994, objects formerly known as ethnographica are now largely found in art galleries and treated like objects of aesthetic rather than cultural historical value. I highlight how a number of contemporary South African curators reject this assumed valorisation that the objects supposedly gain when they are exhibited in the realm of the aesthetics. However, in arguing that contemporary South African artists are just as contemporary, experimental, conceptual and non-traditional as their counterparts from the Global North, the curators let go of an important part of the artistic history of Africa. If so-called traditional African objects are not to be displayed in art galleries, where then, is there room for art forms that are rooted in traditions from Africa before European contact? This article argues that colonial distinctions between art and artefact might be challenged, if curators and museum professionals start highlighting that all objects, no matter who made them, possess both aesthetic and cultural historical value. In this way museums might be able to look beyond colonial classificatory practices and let go of the hierarchy between objects that the material culture of Africa has endured during the past century.
KW - Det Humanistiske Fakultet
KW - Museums
KW - Art
KW - South Africa
KW - Curating
KW - Re-classification
KW - Ethnographica
KW - Colonialism
KW - Post-apartheid
M3 - Tidsskriftartikel
VL - 1
SP - 89
EP - 112
JO - Kulturstudier
JF - Kulturstudier
SN - 1904-5352
ER -
ID: 391166145