The Frontispiece of Leviathan: Hobbes´ Bible Use
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
The Frontispiece of Leviathan : Hobbes´ Bible Use. / Östman, Lars.
In: Akademeia, Vol. Vol 2, No. No 1, 22.01.2012.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Frontispiece of Leviathan
T2 - Hobbes´ Bible Use
AU - Östman, Lars
PY - 2012/1/22
Y1 - 2012/1/22
N2 - This article analyses the frontispiece of Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan with a focus on the relation between theology and politics as it is illustrated on the cover of this grand œuvre, and in particular on the figure of Leviathan himself. The scope of the article is to discuss the form of power and authority symbolised on the frontispiece, and it is thus not an image analyses in the traditional sense. Rather, it is to discuss the kind of political theory the frontispiece represents. Not only is Hobbes’ decision to put forward a theory of a commonwealth that is both civil as well as ecclesiastical only a few years after the great religious Thirty Years’ War a bold one: Leviathan represents a new way of conceiving the relation between sovereign and citizen as it combines Christian political theory and aesthetics. Having its methodological point of departure especially in Giorgio Agamben, the article will develop the argument that Leviathan, in this regard, represents a political version of the Christian angelology. Leviathan becomes the “divine messenger” par excellence, who functions as temporal minister and administrator of God’s will and government. The central questions of the article therefore are: how and why does Hobbes’ Leviathan achieve his authority and power through theological ideas on power, and how decisive is the Bible in this regard? In other words, how is Hobbes’ Bible use political?
AB - This article analyses the frontispiece of Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan with a focus on the relation between theology and politics as it is illustrated on the cover of this grand œuvre, and in particular on the figure of Leviathan himself. The scope of the article is to discuss the form of power and authority symbolised on the frontispiece, and it is thus not an image analyses in the traditional sense. Rather, it is to discuss the kind of political theory the frontispiece represents. Not only is Hobbes’ decision to put forward a theory of a commonwealth that is both civil as well as ecclesiastical only a few years after the great religious Thirty Years’ War a bold one: Leviathan represents a new way of conceiving the relation between sovereign and citizen as it combines Christian political theory and aesthetics. Having its methodological point of departure especially in Giorgio Agamben, the article will develop the argument that Leviathan, in this regard, represents a political version of the Christian angelology. Leviathan becomes the “divine messenger” par excellence, who functions as temporal minister and administrator of God’s will and government. The central questions of the article therefore are: how and why does Hobbes’ Leviathan achieve his authority and power through theological ideas on power, and how decisive is the Bible in this regard? In other words, how is Hobbes’ Bible use political?
KW - Faculty of Humanities
KW - Thomas Hobbes´ Leviathan
KW - Titelblad
KW - Æstetik
KW - Biopolitik
KW - Bibelbrug
KW - Det Gamle Testamente
KW - Thomas Hobbes
KW - Giorgio Agamben
M3 - Journal article
VL - Vol 2
JO - Akademeia
JF - Akademeia
SN - 1923-1504
IS - No 1
ER -
ID: 36405777