Variable rules meet Impoverishment theory: Patterns of agreement levelling in English varieties
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Variable rules meet Impoverishment theory : Patterns of agreement levelling in English varieties. / Parrott, Jeffrey K.; Nevins, Andrew.
In: Lingua, Vol. 120, No. 5, 2010.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Variable rules meet Impoverishment theory
T2 - Patterns of agreement levelling in English varieties
AU - Parrott, Jeffrey K.
AU - Nevins, Andrew
N1 - Please follow the link above for an electronic version of this article, which was published in Lingua, Volume 120, issue 5, May 2010. Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - This paper revives the sociolinguistic notion of ‘variable rules’ (Labov 1969, Cedergren and Sankoff 1974, Guy 1991) as a specific and restricted mechanism within the theoretical framework of Distributed Morphology (Halle and Marantz 1993, Embick and Noyer 2007). We propose that intra-individual paradigm ‘leveling’ variation (or, variable syncretism) can be effectively modeled as resulting from post-syntactic feature deletion rules that apply variably. In other words, variable rules enact a structural change only probabilistically, rather than deterministically, when their structural description is met. By hypothesis, morphological ‘Impoverishment’ operations (Bonet 1991, Halle 1997, Noyer 1998) are induced by the inherent and universal markedness of particular morphosyntactic features or their combination (Greenberg 1966, Croft 2003). We examine markedness-driven variable Impoverishment through case studies of three English varieties: be-leveling in Monmouthshire (Orton 1962-1971) induced by marked [+author], was-leveling in Buckie (Adger and Smith 2005, Adger 2006) induced by marked [+participant], and weren’t- and ain’t-leveling on Smith Island (Wolfram and Schilling-Estes 2003, Mittelstaedt 2006) induced by marked [+negation].
AB - This paper revives the sociolinguistic notion of ‘variable rules’ (Labov 1969, Cedergren and Sankoff 1974, Guy 1991) as a specific and restricted mechanism within the theoretical framework of Distributed Morphology (Halle and Marantz 1993, Embick and Noyer 2007). We propose that intra-individual paradigm ‘leveling’ variation (or, variable syncretism) can be effectively modeled as resulting from post-syntactic feature deletion rules that apply variably. In other words, variable rules enact a structural change only probabilistically, rather than deterministically, when their structural description is met. By hypothesis, morphological ‘Impoverishment’ operations (Bonet 1991, Halle 1997, Noyer 1998) are induced by the inherent and universal markedness of particular morphosyntactic features or their combination (Greenberg 1966, Croft 2003). We examine markedness-driven variable Impoverishment through case studies of three English varieties: be-leveling in Monmouthshire (Orton 1962-1971) induced by marked [+author], was-leveling in Buckie (Adger and Smith 2005, Adger 2006) induced by marked [+participant], and weren’t- and ain’t-leveling on Smith Island (Wolfram and Schilling-Estes 2003, Mittelstaedt 2006) induced by marked [+negation].
KW - Faculty of Humanities
KW - Distributed Morphology
KW - variation
KW - Distributed Morphology
KW - variation
KW - syncretism
KW - Impoverishment
KW - markedness
KW - morphosyntax
U2 - doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2008.05.008
DO - doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2008.05.008
M3 - Journal article
VL - 120
JO - Lingua
JF - Lingua
SN - 0024-3841
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 9725104