Why withdrawal from the European Union is undemocratic
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Why withdrawal from the European Union is undemocratic. / Olsen, Tore Vincents; Rostbøll, Christian F.
In: International Theory, Vol. 9, No. 3, 11.2017, p. 436-465.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Why withdrawal from the European Union is undemocratic
AU - Olsen, Tore Vincents
AU - Rostbøll, Christian F.
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - The Lisbon Treaty from 2009 introduced the possibility for individual member states to withdraw from the European Union on the basis of a unilateral decision. But would withdrawal be democratically legitimate? In fact, the all-affected principle suggests that it is undemocratic for subunits to leave larger political units because it adversely affects other citizens without including them in the decision. However, it is unclear what the currency of this affectedness is and, hence, why withdrawal would be undemocratic. We argue that it is the effect of withdrawal on the status of citizens as free and equal that is decisive and that explains why unilateral withdrawal of subunits from larger units is democratically undesirable. Moreover, on the ‘all-affected status principle’ that we develop, even multilaterally agreed withdrawal is undemocratic because the latter diminishes the future ability of citizens to make decisions together regarding issues that affect their status as free and equal. On this basis, we conclude that it would be undemocratic for a member state to withdraw from the European Union.
AB - The Lisbon Treaty from 2009 introduced the possibility for individual member states to withdraw from the European Union on the basis of a unilateral decision. But would withdrawal be democratically legitimate? In fact, the all-affected principle suggests that it is undemocratic for subunits to leave larger political units because it adversely affects other citizens without including them in the decision. However, it is unclear what the currency of this affectedness is and, hence, why withdrawal would be undemocratic. We argue that it is the effect of withdrawal on the status of citizens as free and equal that is decisive and that explains why unilateral withdrawal of subunits from larger units is democratically undesirable. Moreover, on the ‘all-affected status principle’ that we develop, even multilaterally agreed withdrawal is undemocratic because the latter diminishes the future ability of citizens to make decisions together regarding issues that affect their status as free and equal. On this basis, we conclude that it would be undemocratic for a member state to withdraw from the European Union.
KW - Faculty of Social Sciences
KW - democracy
KW - all-affected principle
KW - citizen status
KW - boundary problem
KW - EU
U2 - 10.1017/S1752971917000094
DO - 10.1017/S1752971917000094
M3 - Journal article
VL - 9
SP - 436
EP - 465
JO - International Theory
JF - International Theory
SN - 1752-9719
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 172275625