Liminality in Language Use: Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Liminality in Language Use : Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective. / Murakami, Kyoko.
In: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, Vol. 44, 10.1007/s12124-010-9115-x, 2010, p. 30-38.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Liminality in Language Use
T2 - Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective
AU - Murakami, Kyoko
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - This essay traces my engagement with Michèle Grossen’s ideas of a dialogical perspective on interaction analysis (Grossen Integrative Psychological andBehavioral Science, 1–22, 2009) and highlights a process account of self ininteraction. Firstly I draw on Turner’s concept of liminality with respect to the transformative, temporal significance in interaction. Secondly I explored further the conversation analytic concepts such as formulation and reformulation as a viable analytical tool for a dialogical perspective. Lastly, I addressed the issue of interaction in institutional settings, in particular with interactional asymmetries of interaction, whilst relativising the I-position dialogical perspective. I explore insights from social anthropology as well as revisiting conversation analysis and discursive psychology, concluding that a promising direction would be sought through a cross-fertilisation between dialogism and other sibling perspectives concerning language use, communication, social action and discourse- and narrative-based analyses.
AB - This essay traces my engagement with Michèle Grossen’s ideas of a dialogical perspective on interaction analysis (Grossen Integrative Psychological andBehavioral Science, 1–22, 2009) and highlights a process account of self ininteraction. Firstly I draw on Turner’s concept of liminality with respect to the transformative, temporal significance in interaction. Secondly I explored further the conversation analytic concepts such as formulation and reformulation as a viable analytical tool for a dialogical perspective. Lastly, I addressed the issue of interaction in institutional settings, in particular with interactional asymmetries of interaction, whilst relativising the I-position dialogical perspective. I explore insights from social anthropology as well as revisiting conversation analysis and discursive psychology, concluding that a promising direction would be sought through a cross-fertilisation between dialogism and other sibling perspectives concerning language use, communication, social action and discourse- and narrative-based analyses.
KW - Faculty of Social Sciences
KW - Interaction analysis
KW - liminality
KW - dialogical perspective
M3 - Journal article
VL - 44
SP - 30
EP - 38
JO - Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science
JF - Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science
SN - 1932-4502
M1 - 10.1007/s12124-010-9115-x
ER -
ID: 147176237